Precisely why could not participants (or program) consider an Ebony people and a White people and inquire, a€?what type are homosexual?

Precisely why could not participants (or program) consider an Ebony people and a White people and inquire, a€?what type are homosexual?

The AUC = .91 cannot mean that 91% of homosexual people in a given populace is recognized, or your classification answers are appropriate 91percent of the time. The results regarding the classifier depends upon the required trade-off between accuracy (e.g., the fraction of gay men those types of classified as gay) and recall (e.g., the fraction of homosexual folks in the populace correctly defined as gay). Continue reading “Precisely why could not participants (or program) consider an Ebony people and a White people and inquire, a€?what type are homosexual?”