Participants
500 and eighty-three people was recruited out-of a big school in Hong kong thanks to advertising printed in the campus and you may places, mass letters because of departments and you may faculties, and you can snowballing. Review occurred for the a research. People completed the latest gender salience measure, the fresh new combined-sex stress measure and stated the demographic record. Every methods was basically exhibited in their totally new English vocabulary as the English is the average out of instruction to have tertiary studies within the Hong kong. This research is actually carried out in accordance into the recommendations and you will acceptance of your College away from Hong-kong Individual Look Stability Committee (HKU HREC). All the victims provided created informed concur according to the Statement out of Helsinki. Parental concur wasn’t required by the new HKU HREC because of it try.
School banding was averaged if participants had attended more than one high school (only 4.1% of the total sample). Participants also reported their college year, total parental income and parental education, numbers of sisters and brothers, faculty, and sexual orientation. Students’ faculty was coded as male-dominated, female-dominated, or gender-balanced based on enrolment statistics . Sexual orientation was assessed https://datingmentor.org/local-hookup/adelaide/ using the adapted Klein Sexual Orientation Grid (KSOG) . Participants rated their sexual orientation in the past 12 months on four aspects, namely attraction, behavior, fantasy, and identity, from 0 (other-sex only) to 6 (same-sex only). The number of participants was roughly balanced by school type and student gender. Participants who had switched between single-sex and coeducational schools were excluded from analysis (n = 27). The final sample consisted of 456 graduates (239 females; 52.4%) who had attended 182 different high schools. These graduates either attended single-sex schools (n = 207) or coeducational schools (n = 249) for high school education. This sample size had over 80% a priori power to detect small differences (.26 < d < .30) at ? = .05, two-tailed . The sample was almost exclusively Chinese (97.6%) and aged years on average. The mean parental income of the sample (HKD42632) suggested that the sample was demographically similar to undergraduate students from several local universities (e.g., [58–60]).
Desk 6 presents detailed participant characteristics by school type and student gender. Consistent with prior research [3,4,8], participants from single-sex schools had parents with higher education level, t(454) = 3.48, p = .001, and attended more academically excellent schools, t(387) = 4.26, p < .001, unequal variances, than did participants from coeducational schools.
Table 6
b 1 = no schooling/pre-number one, dos = first, step three = junior supplementary, cuatro = elderly supplementary, 5 = post-second, six = postgraduate.
c 0 = most other intercourse simply, step one = almost every other sex generally, 2 = almost every other intercourse considerably more, step 3 = each other intercourse equally, 4 = same sex considerably more, 5 = same sex mostly, 6 = same sex just.
d Variables contained in this table was basically provided just like the covariates in most analyses, apart from standard public stress that has been included as the an effective covariate merely when you look at the analyses of mixed-intercourse stress towards college or university sample.
Sex salience size
Sex salience is actually counted by same method utilized in Studies step one. The inter-rater reliability is actually best for the solutions (? between .87 so you’re able to .99).
Part of most other-gender best friends scale
Part of most other-gender best friends is counted because of the same strategy found in Analysis step 1. Percentage of most other-gender family wasn’t examined from the college or university shot.
Mixed-intercourse anxiety size
As in Analysis step 1, people stated the blended-gender anxiety towards the modified dating nervousness measure (DAS-A) . In contrast to Investigation step one, people within the Investigation 2 done the full 21-goods type of DAS-An in this relationship sense is prominent on school sample (93.4% of players said some sort of matchmaking experience; find listing of dating experience situations on the Relationship History Survey from inside the Table D from inside the S1 File). People that had never old in advance of have been questioned to visualize how they will end up being and you will work regarding the revealed items. For it full scale, ten products mentioned Fear of Bad Assessment, 7 things measured Public Worry for the Matchmaking Activities, five factors mentioned Social Worry within the Blended-gender Teams, and you may four filler factors considering a break away from get stress-relevant situations. The inner texture is actually perfect for full DAS-A great (? = .95), Concern with Bad Review (? = .92), Personal Stress in the Relationships (? = .89), and Societal Stress when you look at the Combined-gender Organizations (? = .80). As the all of our appeal wasn’t just to your relationships stress and only 2.6% of college users reported that have zero heterosexual interest at all, i integrated all of the members regarding analysis out-of blended-sex anxiety and you will managed to possess sexual orientation.